Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 4 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2000 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 260 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |