Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 1998 is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander 1998 engine produces 3 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander 2000, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Land Rover Freelander 2000. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Freelander 1998 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2000, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander 1998 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander 1998 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 1998 and Land Rover Freelander 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
| |