Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Suzuki Jimny 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 21.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 40 HP more power than Suzuki Jimny, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Suzuki Jimny. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 10.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Jimny, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Jimny. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 560 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 440 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 76 cm longer than the Suzuki Jimny, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Jimny, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Suzuki Jimny has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Suzuki Jimny, so Suzuki Jimny quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Jimny has
| |