Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 243 HP | |
Torque: | 165 NM | 359 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 123 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 194 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 15.1 | |
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
680 km on highway | 540 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is smaller. Land Rover Freelander is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1076 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2407 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |