Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001

 
Land Rover Freelander
1998 - 2000
Nissan Pathfinder
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol3.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP243 HP
Torque: 165 NM359 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds9.2 seconds
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 123 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 194 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.215.1
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Freelander consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle520 km in combined cycle
680 km on highway540 km on highway
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.64 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.76 m1.80 m
Land Rover Freelander is smaller.
Land Rover Freelander is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data1076 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2407 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`000no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 16003400
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Nissan Pathfinder has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv