Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 49 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.2 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 75, Kia Carnival, Rover 400 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |