Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 16 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 78 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 15 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |