Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`825 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |