Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Subaru Forester 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 53 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.58 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |