Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 80 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |