Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 1998 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander 2000 engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander 1998, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Freelander 1998. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Freelander 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 2000 and Land Rover Freelander 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |