Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 94 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 159 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller. Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |