Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 15 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |