Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Opel Frontera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 19 HP less power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Opel Frontera. Despite less power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm longer than the Opel Frontera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1137 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Opel Frontera has
| |