Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 110 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |