Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 23 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |