Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 19 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |