Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Mercedes ML 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 101 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 13.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller. Land Rover Freelander is 21 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |