Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 46 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 210 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller. Land Rover Freelander is 21 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |