Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 80 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 14.3 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2245 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda Tribute, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |