Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 84 HP less power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 13.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Freelander is 20 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1725 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Lexus RX, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Lexus RX has
| |