Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Kia Sportage 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 22 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.8 | |
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 373 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`930 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |