Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Ford Maverick 2004

 
Land Rover Freelander
2000 - 2002
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP150 HP
Torque: 160 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds10.7 seconds
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP less power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.411.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway720 km on highway
560 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.44 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.76 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data985 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 18002000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Ford Maverick has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv