Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Ford Escape 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Escape, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Ford Escape. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
| Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escape, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Escape, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 934 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1835 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`942 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Escape has
| |