Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 51 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller. Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`506 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |