Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Subaru Forester 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 41 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.59 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 387 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Subaru Forester has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Subaru Forester quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |