Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 23 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |