Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |