Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Subaru Forester 2005

 
Land Rover Freelander
2007 - 2012
Subaru Forester
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Petrol
Diesel (Land Rover Freelander) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Forester) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 160 HP230 HP
Torque: 400 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.6 seconds
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 70 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 80 NM more than Subaru Forester.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data10.5
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
730 km with real consumption510 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ...  More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.48 m
Width: 1.91 m1.74 m
Height: 1.74 m1.58 m
Land Rover Freelander is larger.
Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 755 litres387 litres
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity.
Land Rover Freelander has 368 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7502`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 64003600
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • roomier boot
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv