Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 17 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 878 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 123 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |