Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 233 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 291 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 73 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 109 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 66 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Land Rover Freelander and Suzuki Grand Vitara are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 398 litres | |
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 357 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`170 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |