Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 24 HP less power than Kia Sportage, but torque is 18 NM more than Kia Sportage. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 564 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 191 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.58 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.82 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |