Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 24 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 58 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 410 litres | |
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 345 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 6400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |