Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs BMW X3 2006

 
Land Rover Freelander
2007 - 2012
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 160 HP218 HP
Torque: 400 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.7 seconds
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 58 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data7.7
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres67 litres
730 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery SportInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect.
Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ...  More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine 

BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ...  More about BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.57 m
Width: 1.91 m1.85 m
Height: 1.74 m1.67 m
Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 755 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1560 litres
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 275 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7502`355
Safety:
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 60005800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
BMW X3 has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv