Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs BMW X3 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 58 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 67 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 3 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 275 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`355 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |