Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs BMW X1 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 17 HP less power than BMW X1, but torque is 50 NM more than BMW X1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 61 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm longer than the BMW X1, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 335 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X1 has
| |