Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 260 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |