Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 20 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
800 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 556 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 199 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |