Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 50 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 199 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |