Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2010 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2010 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1742 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 276 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |