Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi A5, Seat Leon, Seat Exeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2010 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 215 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |