Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 199 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |