Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 199 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |