Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Renault Koleos 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander and Renault Koleos have the same engine power. Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Koleos 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Koleos, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1380 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 305 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The Renault Koleos may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |