Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power. Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1742 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 276 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |