Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs BMW X3 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 7 HP more power than BMW X3. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X3 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 275 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`265 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |