Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 52 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.6 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 260 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |