Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 63 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 427 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |