Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 39 HP less power than BMW X3, but torque is 2 NM more than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.6 l/100km | 12.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 275 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |