Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 15 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |