Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 420 NM | 460 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 13 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 878 litres | |
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 473 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`520 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9600 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |