Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 20 HP more power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jeep Renegade. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Renegade is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Used also on Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 25 cm longer than the Jeep Renegade, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1297 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 54 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |